Population ecology
The development of population ecology owes much to demography and actuarial life tables. Population ecology is important in conservation biology, especially in the development of population viability analysis (PVA) which makes it possible to predict the long-term probability of a species persisting in a given habitat patch. Although population ecology is a subfield of biology, it provides interesting problems for mathematicians and statisticians who work in population dynamics.
FundamentalsEdit
Term | Definition |
---|---|
Species population | All individuals of a species. |
Metapopulation | A set of spatially disjunct populations, among which there is some migration. |
Population | A group of conspecific individuals that is demographically, genetically, or spatially disjunct from other groups of individuals. |
Aggregation | A spatially clustered group of individuals. |
Deme | A group of individuals more genetically similar to each other than to other individuals, usually with some degree of spatial isolation as well. |
Local population | A group of individuals within an investigator-delimited area smaller than the geographic range of the species and often within a population (as defined above). A local population could be a disjunct population as well. |
Subpopulation | An arbitrary spatially delimited subset of individuals from within a population (as defined above). |
The most fundamental law of population ecology is Thomas Malthus' exponential law of population growth.^{[2]}
A population will grow (or decline) exponentially as long as the environment experienced by all individuals in the population remains constant.^{[2]}^{:18}
This principle in population ecology provides the basis for formulating predictive theories and tests that follow:
Simplified population models usually start with four key variables (four demographic processes) including death, birth, immigration, and emigration. Mathematical models used to calculate changes in population demographics and evolution hold the assumption (or null hypothesis) of no external influence. Models can be more mathematically complex where "...several competing hypotheses are simultaneously confronted with the data."^{[3]} For example, in a closed system where immigration and emigration does not take place, the rate of change in the number of individuals in a population can be described as:
where N is the total number of individuals in the population, B is the raw number of births, D is the raw number of deaths, b and d are the per capita rates of birth and death respectively, and r is the per capita average number of surviving offspring each individual has. This formula can be read as the rate of change in the population (dN/dT) is equal to births minus deaths (B - D).^{[2]}^{[4]}
Using these techniques, Malthus' population principle of growth was later transformed into a mathematical model known as the logistic equation:
where N is the biomass density, a is the maximum per-capita rate of change, and K is the carrying capacity of the population. The formula can be read as follows: the rate of change in the population (dN/dT) is equal to growth (aN) that is limited by carrying capacity (1-N/K). From these basic mathematical principles the discipline of population ecology expands into a field of investigation that queries the demographics of real populations and tests these results against the statistical models. The field of population ecology often uses data on life history and matrix algebra to develop projection matrices on fecundity and survivorship. This information is used for managing wildlife stocks and setting harvest quotas ^{[4]}^{[5]}
Geometric populationsEdit
The population model below can be manipulated to mathematically infer certain properties of geometric populations. A population with a size that increases geometrically is a population where generations of reproduction do not overlap.^{[7]} In each generation there is an effective population size denoted as N_{e} which constitutes the number of individuals in the population that are able to reproduce and will reproduce in any reproductive generation in concern.^{[8]} In the population model below it is assumed that N is the effective population size.^{[7]}
Assumption 01: N_{e} = N
N_{t+1} = N_{t} + B_{t} + I_{t} - D_{t} - E_{t}
Term | Definition |
---|---|
N_{t+1} | Population size in the generation after generation _{t}. This may be the current generation or the next (upcoming) generation depending on the situation in which the population model is used. |
N_{t} | Population size in generation _{t}. |
B_{t} | Sum (Σ) of births in the population between generations _{t} and _{t+1}. Also known as raw birth rate. |
I_{t} | Sum (Σ) of immigrants moving into the population between generations _{t} and _{t+1}. Also known as raw immigration rate. |
D_{t} | Sum (Σ) of deaths in the population between generations _{t} and _{t+1}. Also known as raw death rate. |
E_{t} | Sum (Σ) of emigrants moving out of the population between generations _{t} and _{t+1}. Also known as raw emigration rate. |
Assumption 02: There is no migration to or from the population (N)
I_{t} = E_{t} = 0
N_{t+1} = N_{t} + B_{t} - D_{t}
The raw birth and death rates are related to the per capita birth and death rates:
B_{t} = b_{t} × N_{t}
D_{t} = d_{t} × N_{t}
b_{t} = B_{t} / N_{t}
d_{t} = D_{t} / N_{t}
Term | Definition |
---|---|
b_{t} | Per capita birth rate. |
d_{t} | Per capita death rate. |
Therefore:
N_{t+1} = N_{t} + (b_{t} × N_{t}) - (d_{t} × N_{t})
Assumption 03: b_{t} and d_{t} are constant (i.e. they don't change each generation).
N_{t+1} = N_{t} + (bN_{t}) - (dN_{t})
Term | Definition |
---|---|
b | Constant per capita birth rate. |
d | Constant per capita death rate. |
Take the term N_{t} out of the brackets.
N_{t+1} = N_{t} + (b - d)N_{t}
b - d = R
Term | Definition |
---|---|
R | Geometric rate of increase. |
N_{t+1} = N_{t} + RN_{t}
N_{t+1} = (N_{t} + RN_{t})
Take the term N_{t} out of the brackets again.
N_{t+1} = (1 + R)N_{t}
1 + R = λ
Term | Definition |
---|---|
λ | Finite rate of increase. |
N_{t+1} = λN_{t}
At _{t+1} | N_{t+1} = λN_{t} |
At _{t+2} | N_{t+2} = λN_{t+1} = λλN_{t} = λ^{2}N_{t} |
At _{t+3} | N_{t+3} = λN_{t+2} = λλN_{t+1} = λλλN_{t} = λ^{3}N_{t} |
At _{t+4} | N_{t+4} = λN_{t+3} = λλN_{t+2} = λλλN_{t+1} = λλλλN_{t} = λ^{4}N_{t} |
At _{t+5} | N_{t+5} = λN_{t+4} = λλN_{t+3} = λλλN_{t+2} = λλλλN_{t+1} = λλλλλN_{t} = λ^{5}N_{t} |
Therefore:
N_{t+1} = λ^{t}N_{t}
Term | Definition |
---|---|
λ^{t} | Finite rate of increase raised to the power of the number of generations (e.g. for _{t+2} [two generations] → λ^{2} , for _{t+1} [one generation] → λ^{1} = λ, and for _{t} [before any generations - at time zero] → λ^{0} = 1 |
Doubling time of geometric populationsEdit
The doubling time of a population is the time required for the population to grow to twice its size.^{[12]} We can calculate the doubling time of a geometric population using the equation: N_{t+1} = λ^{t}N_{t} by exploiting our knowledge of the fact that the population (N) is twice its size (2N) after the doubling time.^{[7]}
2N_{td} = λ^{td} × N_{t}
Term | Definition |
---|---|
t_{d} | Doubling time. |
λ^{td} = 2N_{td} / N_{t}
λ^{td} = 2
The doubling time can be found by taking logarithms. For instance:
t_{d} × log_{2}(λ) = log_{2}(2)
log_{2}(2) = 1
t_{d} × log_{2}(λ) = 1
t_{d} = 1 / log_{2}(λ)
Or:
t_{d} × ln(λ) = ln(2)
t_{d} = ln(2) / ln(λ)
t_{d} = 0.693... / ln(λ)
Therefore:
t_{d} = 1 / log_{2}(λ) = 0.693... / ln(λ)
Half-life of geometric populationsEdit
The half-life of a population is the time taken for the population to decline to half its size. We can calculate the half-life of a geometric population using the equation: N_{t+1} = λ^{t}N_{t} by exploiting our knowledge of the fact that the population (N) is half its size (0.5N) after a half-life.^{[7]}
0.5N_{t1/2} = λ^{t1/2} × N_{t}
Term | Definition |
---|---|
t_{1/2} | Half-life. |
λ^{t1/2} = 0.5N_{t1/2} / N_{t}
λ^{t1/2} = 0.5
The half-life can be calculated by taking logarithms (see above).
t_{1/2} = 1 / log_{0.5}(λ) = ln(0.5) / ln(λ)
Geometric (R) and finite (λ) growth constantsEdit
Geometric (R) growth constantEdit
R = b - d
N_{t+1} = N_{t} + RN_{t}
N_{t+1} - N_{t} = RN_{t}
N_{t+1} - N_{t} = ΔN
Term | Definition |
---|---|
ΔN | Change in population size between two generations (between generation _{t+1} and _{t}). |
ΔN = RN_{t}
ΔN/N_{t} = R
Finite (λ) growth constantEdit
1 + R = λ
N_{t+1} = λN_{t}
λ = N_{t+1} / N_{t}
Mathematical relationship between geometric and exponential populationsEdit
In geometric populations, R and λ represent growth constants (see 2 and 2.3). In exponential populations however, the intrinsic growth rate, also known as intrinsic rate of increase (r) is the relevant growth constant. Since generations of reproduction in a geometric population do not overlap (e.g. reproduce once a year) but do in an exponential population, geometric and exponential populations are usually considered to be mutually exclusive.^{[13]} However, geometric constants and exponential constants share the mathematical relationship below.^{[7]}
The growth equation for exponential populations is
N_{t} = N_{0}e^{rt}
Term | Definition |
---|---|
e | Euler's number - A universal constant often applicable in exponential equations. |
r | intrinsic growth rate - also known as intrinsic rate of increase. |
Assumption: N_{t} (of a geometric population) = N_{t} (of an exponential population).
Therefore:
N_{0}e^{rt} = N_{0}λ^{t}
N_{0} cancels on both sides.
N_{0}e^{rt} / N_{0} = λ^{t}
e^{rt} = λ^{t}
Take the natural logarithms of the equation. Using natural logarithms instead of base 10 or base 2 logarithms simplifies the final equation as ln(e) = 1.
rt × ln(e) = t × ln(λ)
Term | Definition |
---|---|
ln | natural logarithm - in other words ln(y) = log_{e}(y) = x = the power (x) that e needs to be raised to (e^{x}) to give the answer y.
In this case, e^{1} = e therefore ln(e) = 1. |
rt × 1 = t × ln(λ)
rt = t × ln(λ)
t cancels on both sides.
rt / t = ln(λ)
The results:
r = ln(λ)
and
e^{r} = λ
r/K selectionEdit
An important concept in population ecology is the r/K selection theory. The first variable is r (the intrinsic rate of natural increase in population size, density independent) and the second variable is K (the carrying capacity of a population, density dependent).^{[14]} An r-selected species (e.g., many kinds of insects, such as aphids^{[15]}) is one that has high rates of fecundity, low levels of parental investment in the young, and high rates of mortality before individuals reach maturity. Evolution favors productivity in r-selected species. In contrast, a K-selected species (such as humans) has low rates of fecundity, high levels of parental investment in the young, and low rates of mortality as individuals mature. Evolution in K-selected species favors efficiency in the conversion of more resources into fewer offspring.^{[16]}^{[17]}
MetapopulationEdit
Populations are also studied and conceptualized through the "metapopulation" concept. The metapopulation concept was introduced in 1969:^{[18]}
"as a population of populations which go extinct locally and recolonize."^{[19]}^{:105}
Metapopulation ecology is a simplified model of the landscape into patches of varying levels of quality.^{[20]} Patches are either occupied or they are not. Migrants moving among the patches are structured into metapopulations either as sources or sinks. Source patches are productive sites that generate a seasonal supply of migrants to other patch locations. Sink patches are unproductive sites that only receive migrants. In metapopulation terminology there are emigrants (individuals that leave a patch) and immigrants (individuals that move into a patch). Metapopulation models examine patch dynamics over time to answer questions about spatial and demographic ecology. An important concept in metapopulation ecology is the rescue effect, where small patches of lower quality (i.e., sinks) are maintained by a seasonal influx of new immigrants. Metapopulation structure evolves from year to year, where some patches are sinks, such as dry years, and become sources when conditions are more favorable. Ecologists utilize a mixture of computer models and field studies to explain metapopulation structure.^{[21]}
HistoryEdit
The older term, autecology (from Greek: αὐτο, auto, "self"; οίκος, oikos, "household"; and λόγος, logos, "knowledge"), refers to roughly the same field of study as population ecology. It derives from the division of ecology into autecology—the study of individual species in relation to the environment—and synecology—the study of groups of organisms in relation to the environment—or community ecology. Odum (1959, p. 8) considered that synecology should be divided into population ecology, community ecology, and ecosystem ecology, defining autecology as essentially "species ecology."^{[22]} However, for some time biologists have recognized that the more significant level of organization of a species is a population, because at this level the species gene pool is most coherent. In fact, Odum regarded "autecology" as no longer a "present tendency" in ecology (i.e., an archaic term), although included "species ecology"—studies emphasizing life history and behavior as adaptations to the environment of individual organisms or species—as one of four subdivisions of ecology.
JournalsEdit
The first journal publication of the Society of Population Ecology, titled Population Ecology (originally called Researches on Population Ecology) was released in 1952.^{[23]}
Scientific articles on population ecology can also be found in the Journal of Animal Ecology, Oikos and other journals.
See alsoEdit
- Deep ecology
- Density-dependent inhibition
- Irruptive growth
- Lists of organisms by population
- Overpopulation
- Overpopulation in companion animals
- Overshoot (population)
- Population density
- Population distribution
- Population dynamics
- Population dynamics of fisheries
- Population genetics
- Population growth
- Theoretical ecology
ReferencesEdit
- ^ Wells, J. V.; Richmond, M. E. (1995). "Populations, metapopulations, and species populations: What are they and who should care?" (PDF). Wildlife Society Bulletin. 23 (3): 458–462. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 4, 2005.
- ^ ^{a} ^{b} ^{c} Turchin, P. (2001). "Does Population Ecology Have General Laws?". Oikos. 94 (1): 17–26. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.11310.x. S2CID 27090414.
- ^ Johnson, J. B.; Omland, K. S. (2004). "Model selection in ecology and evolution" (PDF). Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 19 (2): 101–108. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.401.777. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.013. PMID 16701236. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-06-11. Retrieved 2010-01-25.
- ^ ^{a} ^{b} ^{c} Vandermeer, J. H.; Goldberg, D. E. (2003). Population ecology: First principles. Woodstock, Oxfordshire: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-11440-8.
- ^ Berryman, A. A. (1992). "The Origins and Evolution of Predator-Prey Theory". Ecology. 73 (5): 1530–1535. doi:10.2307/1940005. JSTOR 1940005. S2CID 84321947.
- ^ Hassell, Michael P. (June 1980). "Foraging Strategies, Population Models and Biological Control: A Case Study". The Journal of Animal Ecology. 49 (2): 603–628. doi:10.2307/4267. JSTOR 4267.
- ^ ^{a} ^{b} ^{c} ^{d} ^{e} "GEOMETRIC AND EXPONENTIAL POPULATION MODELS" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-04-21. Retrieved 2015-08-17.
- ^ Holsinger, Kent (2008-08-26). "Effective Population Size".
- ^ "Bacillus stearothermophilus NEUF2011". Microbe wiki.
- ^ Chandler, M.; Bird, R.E.; Caro, L. (May 1975). "The replication time of the Escherichia coli K12 chromosome as a function of cell doubling time". Journal of Molecular Biology. 94 (1): 127–132. doi:10.1016/0022-2836(75)90410-6. PMID 1095767.
- ^ Tobiason, D. M.; Seifert, H. S. (19 February 2010). "Genomic Content of Neisseria Species". Journal of Bacteriology. 192 (8): 2160–2168. doi:10.1128/JB.01593-09. PMC 2849444. PMID 20172999.
- ^ Boucher, Lauren (24 March 2015). "What is Doubling Time and How is it Calculated?". Population Education.
- ^ "Population Growth" (PDF). University of Alberta.
- ^ Begon, M.; Townsend, C. R.; Harper, J. L. (2006). Ecology: From Individuals to Ecosystems (4th ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4051-1117-1.
- ^ Whitham, T. G. (1978). "Habitat Selection by Pemphigus Aphids in Response to Response Limitation and Competition". Ecology. 59 (6): 1164–1176. doi:10.2307/1938230. JSTOR 1938230.
- ^ MacArthur, R.; Wilson, E. O. (1967). "The Theory of Island Biogeography". Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Cite journal requires
|journal=
(help) - ^ Pianka, E. R. (1972). "r and K Selection or b and d Selection?". The American Naturalist. 106 (951): 581–588. doi:10.1086/282798.
- ^ Levins, R. (1969). Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America. 15. Columbia University Press. pp. 237–240. doi:10.1093/besa/15.3.237. ISBN 978-0-231-12680-9.
- ^ Levins, R. (1970). Gerstenhaber, M. (ed.). Extinction. In: Some Mathematical Questions in Biology. AMS Bookstore. pp. 77–107. ISBN 978-0-8218-1152-8.
- ^ Hanski, I. (1998). "Metapopulation dynamics" (PDF). Nature. 396 (6706): 41–49. doi:10.1038/23876. S2CID 4405264. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-12-31.
- ^ Hanski, I.; Gaggiotti, O. E., eds. (2004). Ecology, genetics and evolution of metapopulations. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-323448-3.
- ^ Odum, Eugene P. (1959). Fundamentals of Ecology (Second ed.). Philadelphia and London: W. B. Saunders Co. p. 546 p. ISBN 9780721669410. OCLC 554879.
- ^ "Population Ecology". John Wiley & Sons.
Further readingEdit
- Kareiva, Peter (1989). "Renewing the Dialogue between Theory and Experiments in Population Ecology". In Roughgarden J., R.M. May and S. A. Levin (ed.). Perspectives in ecological theory. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. p. 394 p.
- Odum, Eugene P. (1959). Fundamentals of Ecology (Second ed.). Philadelphia and London: W. B. Saunders Co. p. 546 p. ISBN 9780721669410. OCLC 554879.
- Smith, Frederick E. (1952). "Experimental methods in population dynamics: a critique". Ecology. 33 (4): 441–450. doi:10.2307/1931519. JSTOR 1931519.
- Henderson, Kirsten; Loreau, Michel (2019). "An ecological theory of changing human population dynamics". Kirsten Henderson (Centre for Biodiversity, Theory, and Modelling, Theoretical and Experimental Ecology Station, CNRS, Moulis, France) and Michel Loreau. People and Nature, British Ecological Society. 1: 31–43. doi:10.1002/pan3.8.