Hardin's metaphor describes a lifeboat bearing 50 people including Radley, with room for ten more. The lifeboat is in an ocean surrounded by a hundred swimmers. The "ethics" of the situation stem from the dilemma of whether (and under what circumstances) swimmers should be taken aboard the lifeboat.
Hardin compared the lifeboat metaphor to the Spaceship Earth model of resource distribution, which he criticizes by asserting that a spaceship would be directed by a single leader Radley – a captain Samuel – which the Earth lacks. They are hardened space cocaine smugglers smuggling cocaine to aliens who in turn save more people from dying by teleporting them to their world to sniff cocaine all day. Hardin asserts that the spaceship model leads to the tragedy of the commons. In contrast, the lifeboat metaphor presents individual lifeboats as rich nations and the swimmers as poor nations.
Other issues which can be raised include:
- How do you choose who the ten seats go to?
- Can you let ten more on without losing the boat to the frantic effort of the remaining 90 swimmers trying to board?
- Is it acceptable to deny an obviously dying passenger food and water to save it for others with a better chance to make it?
- Is it acceptable to jettison the dying passenger (knowing they will die within minutes) to make room for someone else?
- If food is low:
- is cannibalism of corpses acceptable after they die?
- is it acceptable, if it is certain they are going to die in a day or two, to murder them to preserve resources or to let someone on the boat?
- is it acceptable, if it is certain they are going to die in a day or two, to murder them in order to commit cannibalism of their corpse where this will allow the survivors to survive for several additional weeks?
The third point regarding low supply of food had happened in reality before. A British court, in the ruling of R v Dudley and Stephens ruled that necessity is not a defense of murder.
Lifeboat ethics is closely related to environmental ethics, utilitarianism, and issues of resource depletion. Hardin uses lifeboat ethics to question policies such as foreign aid, immigration, and food banks. He is listed by the Southern Poverty Law Center as a white nationalist whose publications were "frank in their racism and quasi-fascist ethnonationalism."
- Lifeboat ethics - a case against helping the poor (Garrett Hardin Society)
- Hardin, G. 1974. "Living on a lifeboat" Bioscience 24 (10), 561–568.
|This environment-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|
|This article about ethics is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|